Goal: The goal for this final paper is to demonstrate your command of humanistic writing and art historical modes of inquiry. You will do this by composing an essay that makes an interpretive claim (thesis), and argues the claim through the paper using the evidence of your own reasoning, visual analysis, and citations from scholarship. The prompt gives you the opportunity to look back through all that we have covered this semester, and to mobilize the history you have learned, as well as the methods of art history, in your interpretation of a work of contemporary art. The goal, simply stated, is to connect the histories we have studied to the world of which you are a part. Prompt: This semester we have looked at works of art from the very beginnings of civilization through to the more recent past. We have discussed how the media in which art is created is related to technological developments, discoveries, and the organization of labor. We have thought about the ways in which social norms are communicated through works of art, as well as the ideals and values of a society. We have talked about the ways in which some works of art were understood to be an expression of an individual’s spirit or character, while other works were created in order to be of service to others, or to a divinity. For this final paper, demonstrate your facility with different modes of thinking and writing about art – formal, historical, and interpretive – by writing a paper that interprets one object in light of another. 1. Choose one of the six works of contemporary art provided in the linked slidesLinks to an external site. on which to write. 2. Identify the object, or class of objects (but choose a representative example), that we have studied in this class to which the image you have chosen responds. In a way, part of your argument is implicitly your choice of comparison. 3. Propose an interpretation of the contemporary work that considers not only its relationship to the past (and to the historical object you identify), but its situation in the present. In other words, your job is to tell the reader how they might understand your two chosen works as in conversation with one another. o If your argument draws on “common knowledge,” there is no need to cite a source for it. But if you use information that is not commonly known, you need to cite it. For instance, if you want to talk about “globalization,” you can expect an educated reader to know what you are talking about. But if you talk about something specific, like India liberalizing its economy in the 1990s, you will need to cite a source. In order to make a compelling interpretation, you may want to consider the following questions: · Why might an artist today engage with works of the past? · If all of these art works are made by artists who address a global audience, what kind of purchase (meaning, power or influence) does the art of a particular time and place have on art produced today? · In what ways does the contemporary work call to mind the historical work? Through medium? Through form? Color? Style? · How does the point of similarity matter? Does meaning inhere in the medium? Or in the way in which it was created? · Which, or in what way, are dissimilarities meaningful? Does the contemporary work purposely subvert your expectations? What effect does this produce? · What emotions are produced by the work? Is it humorous? Serious? Mournful? · Are these works of citation, or of copying? Why would it matter? And to whom? Like your last paper, the goal is not to determine whether one work is better than the other, but rather the ways in which each work represents an idea, belief, event, historical or religious context or person, etc. I have included website information for sites that provide reliable information. While you may do more research on your object or artist, it is not required. IF you do outside research, consider your sources carefully. Make sure that you are using a source that is reliable. Museum websites, established journals, books, or artist interviews are all safe bets. Wikipedia, personal accounts, journalism, blogs, etc., are not reliable sources. Guidelines: This paper must be 1200-1500 words in length. The essay should be written in formal academic style, should contain no grammatical or spelling mistakes, and must include a ‘Works Cited’ section with citations in Chicago style or MLA style. This is a great resource if you need help with citation formats: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/resources.htmlLinks to an external site. Image citations include the artist, title, date, medium, dimensions, and current location, if available. · Make sure that your paper has a title, your name, and the date · Include images of each object you discuss in your paper (historical and contemporary), with captions · Double-space your text and number the pages · Your Works Cited section should be in Chicago or MLA style. You must be consistent with the style you choose. · Turn in your paper in as a .doc or .docx. Other formats WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. · Please refer to the rubric, which is available on Canvas, for the grade requirements of all papers for this course Rubric Paper 3 Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Description Clear, logical, and concrete description of the object that hones in on details as facts that support the reasoned argument. (Scale of 10 points per artwork) This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParagraph Structure Well-constructed paragraphs are composed of: 1. Specific, detailed, and arguable topic sentences; a topic sentence summarizes the key point/argument of the paragraph 2. Arrangement of evidence follows a clear and logical path; relate to the text or images directly as the primary source for your argument. 3. Conclusion/Transitions; This should reassert how your topic sentence relates to the overall argument. Ideally, the conclusion/transition sentence should pivot to subject of the next paragraph. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment and Support: Essay Structure 1. Introduction and body paragraphs proceed logically, using visual and textual evidence to support an interpretive thesis. 2. The logical connections between ideas are evident. 3. The conclusion reiterates/recapitulates/rephrases the thesis and sums up the main points of the essay. 4. The strongest conclusions will consider the “stakes” of the argument: why would someone be interested in this topic? What are questions or problems this topic is linked to? What would a reader learn about a general issue or problem from reading this essay? This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLanguage and grammar Uses sophisticated sentences effectively; usually chooses words aptly; observes professional conventions of written English and manuscript format; makes few minor or technical errors; concise, elegant, and clear authorial voice This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment directions Fulfills all requirements and meets or exceeds expectations uses specific aesthetic details or citations of scholarly sources effectively. Chooses appropriate historical objects with which to put work of contemporary art in dialogue.
Subject: Do My assignment